Brad For Dem Bedded

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

TuxedoBoard SoC Selection

Posted on 03:41 by Unknown
I don't yet know which ARM SoC (system on a chip) I'm going to use for the TuxedoBoard. Cost and features both weigh heavily on my mind when looking at what different vendors have to offer. I wrote an email spewing some of my thoughts on this topic yesterday and I'd like to share an edited version:

Due to my desired price point of about $100 for assembled and tested TuxedoBoards and because I expect the first build's volume to be about 100 boards, I'm looking to keep the SoC cost to under $8 each.

So far, I've not had success finding Cortex-A8 devices in the $8 range when purchased in quantities of about 100 units, regardless of vendor or features. There's quite a good variety of ARM9 parts in the $6 range that include all the features I think I'm interested in. I would prefer to use a Cortex-A8 part but if the cost is too high, ARM9 will get the job done and allow my price point.

BGA packages seem to be the only package offered for all Cortex-A8 and many ARM9 parts. That's OK with me as I've realized that selling an assemble-it-yourself kit isn't as important as making everything open so others can utilize the design. I'd prefer 1mm BGA ball pitch to allow for easy and cheap assembly but 0.8mm is second choice and would work fine. Pitch smaller than 0.8mm is a real turnoff to me because assembly tolerances get very tight and some assembly houses can't promise good yields. As I'm not looking to make the board into a mobile phone, or other space constrained device, physical size of the package isn't as important as ease and cost of assembly.

I'm not that excited about package-on-package (POP) memory, like used on the BeagleBoards. I get the impression that a good number of assembly houses aren't yet comfortable with POP and that the BeagleBoard team went through some issues with manufacturing yield at first. My first manufacturing run will only be around 100 boards, having yield issues would be very bad and ruin the finance side of things.

Freescale makes a very nice looking ARM9 core in the i.MX253. The i.MX253 prices out in the $6 range at Digi-Key. TI makes a competing ARM9 part in the AM1802 but I'm not clear on the pricing or features yet, still have to look into that.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in beagleboard, embedded, tuxedo | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Downsides and Upsides of Altera's Configuration Via Protocol
    Yesterday, I wrote a little about reconfigurable FPGAs attached to the PCI-Express bus as an addition to the general purpose computer. The...
  • Toolchain, Check! Kernel, Check!
    I've been working on the CLFS embedded book for a few months now.  I've been learning a lot and my goal has been to get a CLFS embe...
  • KDE4 Sucks
    I upgraded to Debian 6 Squeeze last weekend on my desktop.  I was very excited to get some more up-to-date packages (git, gcc, kernel, and c...
  • Low Cost ARM Computer
    I was thinking about my ARM + FPGA computer idea some more.  There's already a lot of competition in the single board computer space an...
  • Crypto Load Balancer Using Off The Shelf Hardware
    At my day job, I work a reasonable amount of time with cryptographic and authentication systems. Lately, I've been reading about OpenCL...
  • Embedded Linux and Long Term Support / Updates - Part 2
    In my previous post about embedded Linux long term support, I neglected Ubuntu. I had not realized how much effort Canonical are putting i...
  • The TuxedoBoard has a Brain! (picked out)
    I've chosen an ARM SoC (system on chip) for the TuxedoBoard! The Texas Instruments AM1707 ARM9 core will meet my requirements. The AM1...
  • Pick an ARM ABI When Building GCC
    If you follow the CLFS embedded book for ARM , you'll see that your ABI choice isn't used until compiling packages (ie: after you...
  • SanDisk iNAND
    I stumbled upon SanDisk's iNAND products today while doing some searching about SD cards. The iNAND idea looks very appealing to me co...
  • I'm Writing a Book
    I'm writing a book about embedded Linux but I'm not going to compete with traditional technical books.  O'Reilly isn't my co...

Categories

  • beagleboard
  • blog
  • book review
  • business
  • c
  • chairs
  • clfs
  • community
  • computers
  • crypto
  • db
  • debian
  • disapointment
  • embedded
  • energy
  • fedora
  • flash
  • fpga
  • gcc
  • git
  • google
  • health
  • hp
  • internet
  • iOS
  • learning
  • license
  • linux
  • market
  • microsoft
  • movie review
  • my book
  • next steps
  • open source
  • pandaboard
  • rails
  • software
  • SOPA
  • tuxedo
  • web 2.0
  • webOS
  • windows
  • work

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (10)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ▼  2011 (70)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ▼  April (8)
      • Picking an Open Source Hardware License
      • TuxedoBoard BGAs and Minimum Ball Pitch
      • TuxedoBoard SoC Selection
      • I Dub Thee, TuxedoBoard
      • More Open Source Hardware Ramblings
      • Free IP Block Boards?
      • The Freescale i.MX53 QSB Looks Neat
      • Git is Cool!
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (16)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile