Brad For Dem Bedded

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 17 March 2011

What Is CLFS?

Posted on 03:59 by Unknown
In this week's BeagleCast, my blog post about getting a kernel running on my BeagleBoard-xM with CLFS got a mention. That's cool! But there seemed to be some confusion around what CLFS really is. Let me try to explain, in my own words:

CLFS stands for Cross Linux From Scratch, it's an offshoot of the LFS (Linux From Scratch) project. The goal of both LFS and CLFS is to provide instruction on how to build a Linux system, step by step, from source. In both projects, first a toolchain is built and then a bootable GNU/Linux operating system is built using that toolchain. CLFS differs from LFS in that CLFS builds a GNU/Linux system for an architecture different than the one doing the building. For example, if I have an x86 based computer on my desk that I want to use to build GNU/Linux for a PowerPC system I just bought off eBay, I'd use CLFS rather than LFS.

The methods described by CLFS are very similar to the methods used by OpenEmbedded or Buildroot, but each step is described and there's very little automation. You literally manually build, step by step from upstream source, a toolchain and then a functioning GNU/Linux system. Throughout the books there is information on all the different choices you are required to make. For example: if targeting an ARM processor, when building GCC, you have to choose which ARM version to target, like "armv7-a" for Cortex-A8.

The CLFS project has three different books: Standard, Embedded, and Sysroot. The Standard book is the most developed book and mostly targets people who want to build a cross-compiled system for a desktop computer system. The Embedded book (the one I work on) builds a minimal GNU/Linux system using uClibc targeted at embedded devices where resources may be constrained. The Sysroot book uses a different technique to accomplish similar goals as the Standard book. Both the Standard and Embedded books are under active development, Sysroot hasn't been updated in a while.

Where OpenEmbedded and Buildroot hide a lot of the complexity of building a cross compiled version of GNU/Linux, CLFS hides almost nothing. Think of CLFS as more of a learning experience rather than a quick way to build a cross system. A big advantage of CLFS over an automated system is that errors are usually easy to identify, since everything's done manually you stay at the terminal and you'll probably watch the configure scripts and compiler output. If something doesn't look right, you will have a much better idea of where the problem is, if not what the problem is.

If you'd like to help with the CLFS project, or if you just have questions, come join the IRC channel (#cross-lfs) on Freenode and / or sign up for the clfs-support mailing list.

PS: On Freenode (both in #cross-lfs and #beagle), I'm user "bradfa".
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in beagleboard, clfs, embedded, linux, open source | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Downsides and Upsides of Altera's Configuration Via Protocol
    Yesterday, I wrote a little about reconfigurable FPGAs attached to the PCI-Express bus as an addition to the general purpose computer. The...
  • Toolchain, Check! Kernel, Check!
    I've been working on the CLFS embedded book for a few months now.  I've been learning a lot and my goal has been to get a CLFS embe...
  • KDE4 Sucks
    I upgraded to Debian 6 Squeeze last weekend on my desktop.  I was very excited to get some more up-to-date packages (git, gcc, kernel, and c...
  • Low Cost ARM Computer
    I was thinking about my ARM + FPGA computer idea some more.  There's already a lot of competition in the single board computer space an...
  • Crypto Load Balancer Using Off The Shelf Hardware
    At my day job, I work a reasonable amount of time with cryptographic and authentication systems. Lately, I've been reading about OpenCL...
  • Embedded Linux and Long Term Support / Updates - Part 2
    In my previous post about embedded Linux long term support, I neglected Ubuntu. I had not realized how much effort Canonical are putting i...
  • The TuxedoBoard has a Brain! (picked out)
    I've chosen an ARM SoC (system on chip) for the TuxedoBoard! The Texas Instruments AM1707 ARM9 core will meet my requirements. The AM1...
  • Pick an ARM ABI When Building GCC
    If you follow the CLFS embedded book for ARM , you'll see that your ABI choice isn't used until compiling packages (ie: after you...
  • SanDisk iNAND
    I stumbled upon SanDisk's iNAND products today while doing some searching about SD cards. The iNAND idea looks very appealing to me co...
  • I'm Writing a Book
    I'm writing a book about embedded Linux but I'm not going to compete with traditional technical books.  O'Reilly isn't my co...

Categories

  • beagleboard
  • blog
  • book review
  • business
  • c
  • chairs
  • clfs
  • community
  • computers
  • crypto
  • db
  • debian
  • disapointment
  • embedded
  • energy
  • fedora
  • flash
  • fpga
  • gcc
  • git
  • google
  • health
  • hp
  • internet
  • iOS
  • learning
  • license
  • linux
  • market
  • microsoft
  • movie review
  • my book
  • next steps
  • open source
  • pandaboard
  • rails
  • software
  • SOPA
  • tuxedo
  • web 2.0
  • webOS
  • windows
  • work

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (10)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ▼  2011 (70)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ▼  March (4)
      • File System - Check!
      • What Is CLFS?
      • Toolchain, Check! Kernel, Check!
      • Chromium Minimum Font Size
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (16)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile